An anonymous reader writes: Debian Project Secretary Kurt Roeckx has announced the results of a closely-watched vote on what statement would be made about Richard Stallman's readmission to the Free Software Foundation's board. Seven options were considered, with the Debian project's 420 voting d...
No statement is still a Statement… They just say that they don’t care enough, which is quite sad regarding the topic
It’s not, I think it’s wise of them to reject the controversy itself. It’s a waste of time to pay attention to it or feed into it
I agree that many debates which seems similar are a waist of time, but in this case the hole debate is interwoven with sex traffic and child abuse.
Romeo Juliet law discussion is not pedophilia apologia. Hard conversations need to be done by someone, so they become easy for the ordinary people.
No statement can also mean they have nuanced and/or mixed feelings.
The diagram and beat matrix at the bottom of https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_002 tell a different story:
To me that’s the perfect description of mixed feelings.