I asked on stackoverflow for my problem. And i will ask here too…

Does anybody know, what the problem could be?

  • @taladar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    110 months ago

    It is strange behaviour… a process unlinks a socket-file, which does not belong to him, only the name is the same

    That is what I would expect it to do actually. I would expect it to close the socket it has open and the delete (unlink) it by name.

    • Jakob :lemmy:OPA
      link
      English
      110 months ago

      I expect, it deletes the socket, which on which the process is listening. what if i rename the socket (for some reason). Then the socketfile should be deleted also.